No position-specific interference from prior lists in cued recognition: A challenge for position coding (and other) theories of serial memory.

Position-specific intrusions of items from prior lists are rare but important phenomena that distinguish broad classes of theory in serial memory. They are uniquely predicted by position coding theories, which assume items on all lists are associated with the same set of codes representing their positions. Activating a position code activates items associated with it in current and prior lists in proportion to their distance from the activated position. Thus, prior list intrusions are most likely to come from the coded position. Alternative "item dependent" theories based on associations between items and contexts built from items have difficulty accounting for the position specificity of prior list intrusions. We tested the position coding account with a position-cued recognition task designed to produce prior list interference. Cuing a position should activate a position code, which should activate items in nearby positions in the current and prior lists. We presented lures from the prior list to test for position-specific activation in response time and error rate; lures from nearby positions should interfere more. We found no evidence for such interference in 10 experiments, falsifying the position coding prediction. We ran two serial recall experiments with the same materials and found position-specific prior list intrusions. These results challenge all theories of serial memory: Position coding theories can explain the prior list intrusions in serial recall and but not the absence of prior list interference in cued recognition. Item dependent theories can explain the absence of prior list interference in cued recognition but cannot explain the occurrence of prior list intrusions in serial recall.

Serial attention to serial memory: The psychological refractory period in forward and backward cued recall.

Guided by the conjecture that memory retrieval is attention turned inward, we examined serial attention in serial memory, combining the psychological refractory period (PRP) procedure from attention research with cued recall of two items from brief six-item lists. We report six experiments showing robust PRP effects in cued recall from memory (1-4) and cued report from perceptual displays (5-6), which suggest that memory retrieval requires the same attentional bottleneck as "retrieval" from perception. There were strong direction effects in each memory experiment. Response time (RT) was shorter and accuracy was higher when the cues occurred in the forward direction (left-to-right, top-to-bottom, first-to-last), replicating differences between forward and backward serial recall. Cue positions had strong effects on RT and accuracy in the memory experiments (1-4). The pattern suggested that subjects find cued items in memory by stepping through the list from the beginning or the end, with a preference for starting at the beginning. The perceptual experiments (5-6) showed weak effects of position that were more consistent with direct access. In all experiments, the distance between the cues in the list (lag) had weak effects, suggesting that subjects searched for each cue from the beginning or end of the list more often than they moved through the list from the first cue to the second. Direction, distance, and lag effects on RT and inter-response interval changed with SOA in a manner that suggested they affect bottleneck or pre-bottleneck processes that create and execute a plan for successive retrievals. We conclude that sequential retrieval from memory and sequential attention to perception engage the same computations and we show how computational models of memory can be interpreted as models of attention focused on memory.

Novelty rejection in episodic memory.

Episodic memory theories have postulated that in recognition, a probe is accepted or rejected on the basis of its global similarity to studied items. Mewhort and Johns (2000) directly tested global similarity predictions by manipulating the feature compositions of probes-novelty rejection was facilitated when probes contained novel features even when other features strongly matched, an advantage dubbed the extralist feature effect, which greatly challenged global matching models. In this work, we conducted similar experiments using continuously valued separable- and integral-dimension stimuli. Analogs of extralist lures were constructed where one stimulus dimension contained a value that was more novel than the other dimensions, whereas overall similarity was equated to another class of lures. Facilitated novelty rejection for lures with extralist features was only found for separable-dimension stimuli. While integral-dimension stimuli were well described by a global matching model, the model failed to account for extralist feature effects with separable-dimension stimuli. We applied global matching models-including variants of the exemplar-based linear ballistic accumulator-that employed different means of novelty rejection afforded by separable-dimension stimuli, including decisions based on the global similarity of the individual dimensions and selective attention being directed toward novel probe values (a diagnostic attention model). While these variants produced the extralist feature effect, only the diagnostic attention model succeeded in providing a sufficient account of all of the data. The model was also able to account for extralist feature effects in an experiment with discrete features similar to those from Mewhort and Johns (2000). (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

The spotlight turned inward: the time-course of focusing attention on memory.

Guided by the idea that memory retrieval is selective attention turned inward, we report four experiments examining the time-course of focusing attention on memory. We used a novel episodic flanker task that turns the famous perceptual flanker task inward, presenting memory lists followed by probes that asked whether a cued letter had appeared in the same position in the memory list. Like the perceptual flanker task, we manipulated distance to measure the sharpness of the focus of attention on memory, and compatibility to measure the resistance to distraction. To measure the time-course of focusing, we presented a cue indicating the probed position in the interval between the list and the probe and varied the interval between the cue and the probe (0, 250, 500, 750 ms). The main questions were whether the focus would become sharper and resistance to distraction would become stronger as cue-probe delay increased. Experiments 1a and 1b showed strong distance effects and strong cue-probe interval effects but no reliable interaction between them. Experiments 2a and 2b showed robust compatibility effects and cue-probe interval effects but no interaction between them. Thus, there is no evidence that the sharpness of the focus increases and little evidence that the resistance to distraction improves over time. The robust reduction in response time and slight increase in accuracy with cue-probe interval may reflect the time-course of orienting to the cued position in the memory list prior to focusing on the item it contains.

Diffusion theory of the antipodal "shadow" mode in continuous-outcome, coherent-motion decisions.

Continuous-outcome decisions, in which responses are made on continuous scales, are increasingly used to study perception and memory for stimulus attributes like color, orientation, and motion. This interest has led to the development of models of continuous-outcome decision processes like the circular diffusion model that predict joint distributions of decision outcomes and response times (RTs). We use the circular diffusion model and a new spherical generalization of it to model performance in a continuous-outcome version of the random-dot motion task. The task is a benchmark test of decision models because it yields bimodal distributions of decision outcomes: In addition to a peak or mode in the true direction of motion, there is a secondary, antipodal, mode at 180° to the true direction. Models like the circular diffusion model, in which evidence is accumulated by a single process, are thought to be unable to predict bimodality. We compared diffusion models for the continuous motion task in which evidence is accumulated in either a two-dimensional (2D) or a three-dimensional (3D) representational space. We found that performance was well described by a spherical (3D) diffusion model in which the drift rate encodes perceived motion direction and strength and the points on the bounding sphere representing the decision criterion are projected onto a 2D circle to make a response. A model with an antipodal component of drift rate and drift-rate variability successfully predicted bimodal distributions of decision outcomes and the joint distributions of decision outcomes and RT for individual participants. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

A circular diffusion model of continuous-outcome source memory retrieval: Contrasting continuous and threshold accounts.

A circular analogue of the diffusion model adapted for continuous response tasks is applied to a continuous-outcome source memory task. In contrast to existing models of source retrieval that attribute all of the variability in responding to memory, the circular diffusion model decomposes noise into variability arising from memory and from decision processes. We compared three models: (1) a single diffusion process with trial-to-trial variability in drift rate, (2) a mixture of two diffusion processes, one with positive drift that does not vary from trial-to-trial, and a second zero-drift process that represents discrete guessing, and (3) a hybrid model that mixed positive and zero-drift processes with trial-to-trial variability in the positive drift process. Comparison of model fits to joint response error and response-time (RT) data suggest that a memory strength threshold under which no information is retrieved appears to underlie responding in a continuous-report source memory task. Additionally, we also conditioned participants' source responding on their confidence in an old/new recognition task, ruling out the possibility that participant guessing was only due to unrecognized items. Overall, our findings support an all-or-none or some-or none view of source memory retrieval and pose a challenge to continuous models of source memory.

A single, simple, statistical mechanism explains resource distribution and temporal updating in visual short-term memory.

Investigations into the way that information is held and integrated within the visual system provides some basis for understanding how visual information is represented and processed. Just over sixty years ago, Swets, Shipley, McKey, and Green (1959) demonstrated that performance within an auditory detection task increases as a function of the square root of the number of stimulus observation intervals, following the predictions of basic sampling theory, indicating the efficient perceptual integration of stimulus information. This principle of observer performance contingent on a constant rate of stimulus sampling also forms the basis of the sample-size model (Palmer, 1990; Sewell, Lilburn, & Smith, 2014) which seeks to provide an account of how memory resources might be divided among item representations in visual short-term memory (VSTM). In this article, we combine the multiple observations paradigm of Swets and colleagues with the VSTM paradigm of Sewell and colleagues and show that the sample-size relationship accounts for both the increase in performance with the number of presentation intervals and the way that performance changes as a function of the number of items in memory. The model provides an account of both the overall information limit of VSTM and an account of the dynamics of that limit, demonstrating not only that observers can selectively update specific representations in memory but that performance in this task is accounted for by a simple statistical constraint. We discuss the implications for models of VSTM capacity and architecture generally, focusing on the implications for objecthood and the characteristics of encoding to and retrieval from memory.

Vision for the blind: visual psychophysics and blinded inference for decision models.

Evidence accumulation models like the diffusion model are increasingly used by researchers to identify the contributions of sensory and decisional factors to the speed and accuracy of decision-making. Drift rates, decision criteria, and nondecision times estimated from such models provide meaningful estimates of the quality of evidence in the stimulus, the bias and caution in the decision process, and the duration of nondecision processes. Recently, Dutilh et al. (Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 26, 1051-1069, 2019) carried out a large-scale, blinded validation study of decision models using the random dot motion (RDM) task. They found that the parameters of the diffusion model were generally well recovered, but there was a pervasive failure of selective influence, such that manipulations of evidence quality, decision bias, and caution also affected estimated nondecision times. This failure casts doubt on the psychometric validity of such estimates. Here we argue that the RDM task has unusual perceptual characteristics that may be better described by a model in which drift and diffusion rates increase over time rather than turn on abruptly. We reanalyze the Dutilh et al. data using models with abrupt and continuous-onset drift and diffusion rates and find that the continuous-onset model provides a better overall fit and more meaningful parameter estimates, which accord with the known psychophysical properties of the RDM task. We argue that further selective influence studies that fail to take into account the visual properties of the evidence entering the decision process are likely to be unproductive.

Modeling continuous outcome color decisions with the circular diffusion model: Metric and categorical properties.

The circular diffusion model is extended to provide a theory of the speed and accuracy of continuous outcome color decisions and used to characterize eye-movement decisions about the hues of noisy color patches in an isoluminant, equidiscriminability color space. Heavy-tailed distributions of decision outcomes were found with high levels of chromatic noise, similar to those found in visual working memory studies with high memory loads. Decision times were longer for less accurate decisions, in agreement with the slow error property typically found in difficult 2-choice tasks. Decision times were shorter, and responses were more accurate in parts of the space corresponding to nameable color categories, although the number and locations of the categories varied among participants. We show that these findings can be predicted by a theory of across-trial variability in the quality of the evidence entering the decision process, represented mathematically by the drift rate of the diffusion process. The heavy-tailed distributions of decision outcomes and the slow-error pattern can be predicted by either of 2 models of drift rate. One model is based on encoding failures and the other is based on a nonlinear transformation of the stimulus space. Both models predict highly inaccurate stimulus representations on some trials, leading to heavy-tailed distributions and slow errors. The color-category effects were successfully modeled as stimulus biases in a similarity-choice framework, in which the drift rate is the vector sum of the encoded metric and categorical representations of the stimulus. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Correction: Causal knowledge promotes behavioral self-regulation: An example using climate change dynamics.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184480.].

The separable effects of feature precision and item load in visual short-term memory.

Visual short-term memory (VSTM) has been described as being limited by the number of discrete visual objects, the aggregate quantity of information across multiple visual objects, or some combination of the two. Many recent studies examining these capacity limitations have shown that increasing the number of items in VSTM increases the frequency and magnitude of errors in a participant's recall of the stimulus. This increase in response dispersion has been interpreted as a loss of precision in an item's representation as the number of items in memory increases, possibly due to a change in the tuning of the underlying representation. However, increased response dispersion can also be caused by a reduction in the total memory strength available for decision making as a consequence of a reduction in the total amount of a fixed resource representing a stimulus. We investigated the effects of load on the precision of memory representations in a fine orientation discrimination task. Accuracy was well captured by extending a simple sample-size model of VSTM, using a tuning function to account for the effect of orientation precision on performance. The best model of the data was one in which the item strength decreased progressively with memory load at all stimulus exposure durations but in which tuning bandwidth was invariant. Our results imply that memory strength and feature precision are experimentally dissociable attributes of VSTM.

Limitations of pure encoding capacity accounts of visual short-term memory phenomena: Reply to Bundesen (2018).

In his commentary, Bundesen (2018) argued that limited encoding capacity can account for the near-equivalent set size effects on performance under conditions of simultaneous and sequential presentation reported by Sewell, Lilburn, and Smith (2014). While we agree that limited encoding capacity could, in principle, account for this equivalency, we argue that such an account rests on a number of fortuitous temporal coincidences. In particular, we note that pure encoding capacity limitations appear ill equipped to explain near-equivalent simultaneous-sequential performance across a range of stimulus exposure durations, set sizes, and with stimuli with quite different attentional demands. (PsycINFO Database Record

The power law of visual working memory characterizes attention engagement.

The quality or precision of stimulus representations in visual working memory can be characterized by a power law, which states that precision decreases as a power of the number of items in memory, with an exponent whose magnitude typically varies in the range 0.5 to 0.75. The authors show that the magnitude of the exponent is an index of the attentional demands of memory formation. They report 5 visual working memory experiments with tasks using noisy, backward-masked stimuli that varied in their attentional demands and show that the magnitude of the exponent increases systematically with the attentional demands of the task. Recall accuracy in the experiments was well described by an attention-weighted sample-size model that views visual working memory as a resource comprised of noisy evidence samples that are recruited during stimulus exposure and which can be allocated flexibly under attentional control. The magnitude of the exponent indexes the degree to which attention allocates resources to items in memory unequally rather than equally. (PsycINFO Database Record

Causal knowledge promotes behavioral self-regulation: An example using climate change dynamics.

Adopting successful climate change mitigation policies requires the public to choose how to balance the sometimes competing goals of managing CO2 emissions and achieving economic growth. It follows that collective action on climate change depends on members of the public to be knowledgeable of the causes and economic ramifications of climate change. The existing literature, however, shows that people often struggle to correctly reason about the fundamental accumulation dynamics that drive climate change. Previous research has focused on using analogy to improve people's reasoning about accumulation, which has been met with some success. However, these existing studies have neglected the role economic factors might play in shaping people's decisions in relation to climate change. Here, we introduce a novel iterated decision task in which people attempt to achieve a specific economic goal by interacting with a causal dynamic system in which human economic activities, CO2 emissions, and warming are all causally interrelated. We show that when the causal links between these factors are highlighted, people's ability to achieve the economic goal of the task is enhanced in a way that approaches optimal responding, and avoids dangerous levels of warming.

The attention-weighted sample-size model of visual short-term memory: Attention capture predicts resource allocation and memory load.

We investigated the capacity of visual short-term memory (VSTM) in a phase discrimination task that required judgments about the configural relations between pairs of black and white features. Sewell et al. (2014) previously showed that VSTM capacity in an orientation discrimination task was well described by a sample-size model, which views VSTM as a resource comprised of a finite number of noisy stimulus samples. The model predicts the invariance of [Formula: see text] , the sum of squared sensitivities across items, for displays of different sizes. For phase discrimination, the set-size effect significantly exceeded that predicted by the sample-size model for both simultaneously and sequentially presented stimuli. Instead, the set-size effect and the serial position curves with sequential presentation were predicted by an attention-weighted version of the sample-size model, which assumes that one of the items in the display captures attention and receives a disproportionate share of resources. The choice probabilities and response time distributions from the task were well described by a diffusion decision model in which the drift rates embodied the assumptions of the attention-weighted sample-size model.

Object selection costs in visual working memory: A diffusion model analysis of the focus of attention.

A central question in working memory research concerns the degree to which information in working memory is accessible to other cognitive processes (e.g., decision-making). Theories assuming that the focus of attention can only store a single object at a time require the focus to orient to a target representation before further processing can occur. The need to orient the focus of attention implies that single-object accounts typically predict response time costs associated with object selection even when working memory is not full (i.e., memory load is less than 4 items). For other theories that assume storage of multiple items in the focus of attention, predictions depend on specific assumptions about the way resources are allocated among items held in the focus, and how this affects the time course of retrieval of items from the focus. These broad theoretical accounts have been difficult to distinguish because conventional analyses fail to separate components of empirical response times related to decision-making from components related to selection and retrieval processes associated with accessing information in working memory. To better distinguish these response time components from one another, we analyze data from a probed visual working memory task using extensions of the diffusion decision model. Analysis of model parameters revealed that increases in memory load resulted in (a) reductions in the quality of the underlying stimulus representations in a manner consistent with a sample size model of visual working memory capacity and (b) systematic increases in the time needed to selectively access a probed representation in memory. The results are consistent with single-object theories of the focus of attention. The results are also consistent with a subset of theories that assume a multiobject focus of attention in which resource allocation diminishes both the quality and accessibility of the underlying representations. (PsycINFO Database Record

From shunting inhibition to dynamic normalization: Attentional selection and decision-making in brief visual displays.

Normalization models of visual sensitivity assume that the response of a visual mechanism is scaled divisively by the sum of the activity in the excitatory and inhibitory mechanisms in its neighborhood. Normalization models of attention assume that the weighting of excitatory and inhibitory mechanisms is modulated by attention. Such models have provided explanations of the effects of attention in both behavioral and single-cell recording studies. We show how normalization models can be obtained as the asymptotic solutions of shunting differential equations, in which stimulus inputs and the activity in the mechanism control growth rates multiplicatively rather than additively. The value of the shunting equation approach is that it characterizes the entire time course of the response, not just its asymptotic strength. We describe two models of attention based on shunting dynamics, the integrated system model of Smith and Ratcliff (2009) and the competitive interaction theory of Smith and Sewell (2013). These models assume that attention, stimulus salience, and the observer's strategy for the task jointly determine the selection of stimuli into visual short-term memory (VSTM) and the way in which stimulus representations are weighted. The quality of the VSTM representation determines the speed and accuracy of the decision. The models provide a unified account of a variety of attentional phenomena found in psychophysical tasks using single-element and multi-element displays. Our results show the generality and utility of the normalization approach to modeling attention.

An information capacity limitation of visual short-term memory.

Research suggests that visual short-term memory (VSTM) has both an item capacity, of around 4 items, and an information capacity. We characterize the information capacity limits of VSTM using a task in which observers discriminated the orientation of a single probed item in displays consisting of 1, 2, 3, or 4 orthogonally oriented Gabor patch stimuli that were presented in noise for 50 ms, 100 ms, 150 ms, or 200 ms. The observed capacity limitations are well described by a sample-size model, which predicts invariance of ∑(i)(d'(i))² for displays of different sizes and linearity of (d'(i))² for displays of different durations. Performance was the same for simultaneous and sequentially presented displays, which implicates VSTM as the locus of the observed invariance and rules out explanations that ascribe it to divided attention or stimulus encoding. The invariance of ∑(i)(d'(i))² is predicted by the competitive interaction theory of Smith and Sewell (2013), which attributes it to the normalization of VSTM traces strengths arising from competition among stimuli entering VSTM.